Where are MY Heroes?
Warning: RANT
Last night I watched (on tape, the old-fashioned way) the first hour of NBC’s new drama “Heroes.” I’ll finish it tonight. I’ve been kind of geeked about it, because I like the whole “finding out about special powers and what to do with them” storyline, whether it's mutants or wizards or tales of personal strength and growth. I was expecting last night’s episode to be full of all kinds of wonder and discovery and drama, and maybe even the writing and characterization would be decent, too! Well, it wasn’t all bad and there were some interesting moments, but a lot of it proved to be just as mundane and clichéd as your typical sitcom. Minor irritations, really. What irked me the most, though, was the portrayal of the women “heroes.” The only women depicted as having powers (so far) in this drama are the sex worker and the cheerleader (we open with hot, hot scene of Sex Worker writhing about in her skivvies before a camera, and later we get to see her be assaulted. How original.) The cheerleader’s story is initially told through the eyes of the underdog boy who videotapes her. It may have been her story, but I felt that he was the sympathetic character at first. He was the typical high school underdog. We’ve been trained for years to see through his eyes. Fortunately we lose the boy and the cheerleader’s story looks like it will improve as the show continues. The other major female character was the beautiful young black woman who is dating the crazy artist but who kind of likes the (male) nurse. I don’t yet know what she does besides date guys and take care of grandpa. She may be a hero, she may be important, she may not, I’ll hold my judgment until I’ve seen more.
I know, I know, the target audience here is young men, and young women are secondary targets, blah blah blah. But seriously, what harm would it do to make the artist, or the academic, or the nurse/politico sibling pair, or the Japanese guy a woman? Would it really turn away male viewers if they had to watch a woman that’s neither sexual nor love interest nor the “other?” I’ll bet it wouldn’t. In fact, if “Heroes” featured better female characters it may even attract more female viewers. Network television loves more viewers! Let’s compare these characters to another ensemble of superheroes: the mutants of the X-Men films. The X-Men were a more gender diverse group. The female characters were strong leaders, scared teens, and loyal teammates. They were sexy, sure, but all the X-Men were hotties so attractiveness was pretty all-inclusive. Many women watched the X-Men, in large part because we were able to identify with the characters (in a fantasy sense, not a reality sense). And did the male audience reject X-Men because there were too many girls? No! It tore up the box office! A decent script helped, sure, but that’s beside the point. What I’m trying to say is this: television executives should not fear the strong women. Just because there’s a respectable woman main character or two in the cast does not make it a girls’ show and therefore unwatchable to men. Ditto to Hollywood.
BTW: Women also like X-Men because Wolverine and Cyclops are babes, but babes alone don’t draw us en masse to the movie theaters.
Warning: RANT
Last night I watched (on tape, the old-fashioned way) the first hour of NBC’s new drama “Heroes.” I’ll finish it tonight. I’ve been kind of geeked about it, because I like the whole “finding out about special powers and what to do with them” storyline, whether it's mutants or wizards or tales of personal strength and growth. I was expecting last night’s episode to be full of all kinds of wonder and discovery and drama, and maybe even the writing and characterization would be decent, too! Well, it wasn’t all bad and there were some interesting moments, but a lot of it proved to be just as mundane and clichéd as your typical sitcom. Minor irritations, really. What irked me the most, though, was the portrayal of the women “heroes.” The only women depicted as having powers (so far) in this drama are the sex worker and the cheerleader (we open with hot, hot scene of Sex Worker writhing about in her skivvies before a camera, and later we get to see her be assaulted. How original.) The cheerleader’s story is initially told through the eyes of the underdog boy who videotapes her. It may have been her story, but I felt that he was the sympathetic character at first. He was the typical high school underdog. We’ve been trained for years to see through his eyes. Fortunately we lose the boy and the cheerleader’s story looks like it will improve as the show continues. The other major female character was the beautiful young black woman who is dating the crazy artist but who kind of likes the (male) nurse. I don’t yet know what she does besides date guys and take care of grandpa. She may be a hero, she may be important, she may not, I’ll hold my judgment until I’ve seen more.
I know, I know, the target audience here is young men, and young women are secondary targets, blah blah blah. But seriously, what harm would it do to make the artist, or the academic, or the nurse/politico sibling pair, or the Japanese guy a woman? Would it really turn away male viewers if they had to watch a woman that’s neither sexual nor love interest nor the “other?” I’ll bet it wouldn’t. In fact, if “Heroes” featured better female characters it may even attract more female viewers. Network television loves more viewers! Let’s compare these characters to another ensemble of superheroes: the mutants of the X-Men films. The X-Men were a more gender diverse group. The female characters were strong leaders, scared teens, and loyal teammates. They were sexy, sure, but all the X-Men were hotties so attractiveness was pretty all-inclusive. Many women watched the X-Men, in large part because we were able to identify with the characters (in a fantasy sense, not a reality sense). And did the male audience reject X-Men because there were too many girls? No! It tore up the box office! A decent script helped, sure, but that’s beside the point. What I’m trying to say is this: television executives should not fear the strong women. Just because there’s a respectable woman main character or two in the cast does not make it a girls’ show and therefore unwatchable to men. Ditto to Hollywood.
BTW: Women also like X-Men because Wolverine and Cyclops are babes, but babes alone don’t draw us en masse to the movie theaters.

